Burnout, Work-Life Balance, and Employee ProductivityIn a Hybrid Work Environment: A Qualitative Study in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63541/tw5exh58Keywords:
Employee Burnout, Work-Life Balance, Hybrid Productivity, Psychological Detachment, Indonesia Hybrid Work SystemAbstract
The rapidly expanding hybrid work environment post-COVID-19 pandemic presents complex challenges for human resource management, particularly regarding burnout, work-life balance, and employee productivity. This study aims to thoroughly analyze how burnout and work-life boundary ambiguity affect employee productivity within Indonesia's hybrid work system. Employing a qualitative phenomenological approach through in-depth interviews, focus group discussions (FGD), and observation with 12 cross-sector informants, this research identifies four primary themes: (1) multidimensional burnout manifesting differently in hybrid contexts compared to traditional offices; (2) endemic work-life boundary ambiguity in hybrid arrangements; (3) contextual and non-linear productivity; and (4) the critical role of managerial support as a moderator. This study's novelty lies in conceptualizing the Hybrid Burnout Paradox, wherein hybrid work flexibility simultaneously reduces and exacerbates burnout depending on employees' psychological boundary quality. These findings challenge assumptions that hybrid flexibility inherently improves well-being, offering a new analytical framework relevant to HR practitioners and Indonesian employment policymakers. Practical implications include recommendations for hybrid policy development centered on structured autonomy, psychological boundary management training, and adaptive managerial role design.
References
Angelici, M., & Profeta, P. (2023). Smart-working: Work flexibility without constraints. Management Science, 69(4), 1852–1875. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4388
Bailenson, J. N. (2021). Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
Barber, L. K., & Santuzzi, A. M. (2015). Please respond ASAP: Workplace telepressure and employee recovery. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(2), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038278
Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju032
Choudhury, P., Foroughi, C., & Larson, B. (2021). Work-from-anywhere: The productivity effects of geographic flexibility. Strategic Management Journal, 42(4), 655–683. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3251
Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700536001
Danna, K., & Griffin, R. W. (1999). Health and well-being in the workplace: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Management, 25(3), 357–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500305
Derks, D., van Mierlo, H., & Schmitz, E. B. (2020). A diary study on work-related smartphone use, psychological detachment and exhaustion: Examining the role of the perceived segmentation norm. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19(1), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035076
Drucker, P. F. (1999). Knowledge-worker productivity: The biggest challenge. California Management Review, 41(2), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165987
Elsbach, K. D., & Cable, D. M. (2012). Why showing your face at work matters. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(4), 10–12.
Freudenberger, H. J. (1974). Staff burn-out. Journal of Social Issues, 30(1), 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.x
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2022). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/258214
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Paulist Press.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage Publications.
Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia. (2022). Survei penerapan sistem kerja hybrid di sektor formal Indonesia 2022. Kemenaker RI.
Kossek, E. E., Gettings, P., & Misra, K. (2021). The future of flexibility at work. Harvard Business Review, September–October 2021, 46–55.
Kossek, E. E., & Lautsch, B. A. (2018). Work–life flexibility for whom? Occupational status and work–life inequality in upper, middle, and lower level jobs. Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 5–36. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0059
Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (2016). Burnout. In G. Fink (Ed.), Stress: Concepts, cognition, emotion, and behavior (pp. 351–357). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800951-2.00044-3
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030020205
McKinsey Global Institute. (2022). Women in the workplace 2022: Asia-Pacific perspectives. McKinsey & Company.
Molino, M., Ingusci, E., Signore, F., Manuti, A., Giancaspro, M. L., Russo, V., Zito, M., & Cortese, C. G. (2020). Wellbeing costs of technology use during Covid-19 remote working: An investigation using the Italian translation of the Technostress Creators Scale. Sustainability, 12(15), 5911. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155911
Nippert-Eng, C. E. (1996). Home and work: Negotiating boundaries through everyday life. University of Chicago Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Prihatsanti, U., Suryanto, S., & Hendriani, W. (2022). Using case study method in research. Psychological Research and Intervention, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.21831/pri.v5i1.47458
Schlachter, S., McDowall, A., Cropley, M., & Inceoglu, I. (2023). Voluntary work-related technology use during non-work time: A narrative synthesis of empirical research and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(4), 883–917. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12164
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Sage Publications.
Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2007). The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204
Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109
Tjakraatmadja, J. H. (2022). Manajemen pengetahuan dalam konteks budaya kerja Indonesia: Tantangan dan peluang di era hybrid. Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia, 22(3), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.25124/jmi.v22i3.3842
World Health Organization. (2019). Burn-out an 'occupational phenomenon': International Classification of Diseases. WHO. https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2019-burn-out-an-occupational-phenomenon-international-classification-of-diseases
Xiao, Y., Becerik-Gerber, B., Lucas, G., & Roll, S. C. (2021). Impacts of working from home during COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental well-being of office workstation users. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 63(3), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002097
Yildirim, T. M., & Eslen-Ziya, H. (2021). The differential impact of COVID-19 on remote working men and women in Turkey: Findings from an online national survey data. Gender, Work and Organization, 28(S1), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12529
Zheng, X., Zhu, W., Zhao, H., & Zhang, C. (2022). Employee well-being in organizations: Theoretical model, scale development, and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(5), 621–644. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1990
Zito, M., Emanuel, F., Molino, M., Cortese, C. G., Ghislieri, C., & Colombo, L. (2023). Turnover intentions in a call center: The role of emotional dissonance, job demands, job resources, and job satisfaction. PLOS ONE, 13(2), e0192126. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192126
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ratnasartika Aprilyani, Sri Ratnawati, Anna Mariani Kartasamita (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Cakrawala Management Science Journal is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
